— Your Host:
Carolyn Hax
with:
—
Carolyn Hax
This is a great example of reverse engineering when analyzing a problem.
Carolyn Hax is one of my favorite columnists. When I was a kid I used to read the comics page every day and the advice columnists would be positioned on the same page so I got in the habit of reading them also. I used to cringe at their overly obvious and pandering advice.
I would wonder why the assumptions and point-of-view of the aggrieved letter writer were never questioned, even sympathetically. In this particular column, Carolyn Hax responds to the initial question and then as a follow-up explains how she approaches giving advice in situations like these by breaking it down into component pieces.
Re: Husband’s Ex: The way you broke down the issues to explore is outstanding and so logical, but not something I could do myself. It feels like some of the questions I should ask myself are swirling around in my head but they never land. Do you have any tips on how to approach an analysis like this? — Asking Myself Asking Myself: It’s a skill like any other. You start with the thing that’s bothering you — in this example, “Husband helps ex with her baby more than I think is okay.” Then you break it down into pieces. Husband, ex-girlfriend, time, baby. Then you see whether your feelings change if you change each element, one at a time:
Re: Husband’s Ex: The way you broke down the issues to explore is outstanding and so logical, but not something I could do myself. It feels like some of the questions I should ask myself are swirling around in my head but they never land. Do you have any tips on how to approach an analysis like this? — Asking Myself Asking Myself: It’s a skill like any other. You start with the thing that’s bothering you — in this example, “Husband helps ex with her baby more than I think is okay.” Then you break it down into pieces. Husband, ex-girlfriend, time, baby. Then you see whether your feelings change if you change each element, one at a time: